EN简体繁體日本語
ログイン
ホーム / Anthropic / CCDV-F
Anthropic · CCDV-F

CCDV-F 試験練習問題

Claude Certified Developer – Foundations

CCDV-F の PDF 練習問題。資料の言語は 英語です。購入はこの試験のみで、自動更新はありません。

試験概要

CCDV-F は「Claude Certified Developer – Foundations」の認定試験です。試験形式、時間、対応言語は以下をご確認ください。最新の出題範囲や受験条件は公式サイトをご参照ください。

Claude Partner Network 会員向けの試験として案内されています。受験資格、対応言語、日程は Partner Academy でご確認ください。

試験コード
CCDV-F
公式の試験・資格名
Claude Certified Developer – Foundations
試験形式
Proctored, identity-verified certification assessment delivered through Pearson
受験可能な言語
公開されている公式資料から全対応言語を確認できませんでした。公式の予約ページをご確認ください。

公式試験の対応言語と練習問題ファイルの言語は異なります。試験の版と言語は公式の予約ページでご確認ください。

公式情報： 公式サイト
情報確認日：2026-10-20

対応言語

  • 英語
  • 簡体字中国語
購入前にお試し

最初の 20 問を無料プレビュー

全 53 問

題庫の元の順序で表示します。回答欄を開くと、正解と収録されている解説を確認できます。

問題の言語：英語。問題文・選択肢・正解・解説は元の題庫の言語で表示します。

免責事項：ExamPico の問題はすべてインターネット上の情報を整理したもので、学習参考用として提供しています。

問題 16

Question#16Topic1

A teammate is reviewing the team’s threat model for a Claude application and has asked you to identify the categories of AI-specific threats that the model should cover. The teammate has already listed traditional web application threats and wants to know what additional categories apply to a Claude application.
Which AI-specific threat categories would you add?

  1. A. Supply chain attacks on the Claude SDK because the SDK itself is the only point of vulnerability that a Claude application introduces beyond traditional web application threats.
  2. B. Network-level denial of service and physical infrastructure attacks, because these categories cover the threats most likely to affect any Claude application in production.
  3. C. Cross-site scripting and SQL injection, because these traditional web application threats apply with equal weight to any application that uses Claude in any way.
  4. D. Prompt injection, data leakage from prompts or context, jailbreak attempts, and unsafe model output that bypasses application controls.
正解と解説を表示

正解

D

解説

AI-specific threat categories for Claude applications include prompt injection, data leakage from prompts or context, jailbreak attempts, and unsafe model output that bypasses application controls. Source: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/test-and-evaluate/strengthen-guardrails/mitigate-jailbreaks

問題 17

Question#17Topic1

A team has deployed a multi-agent system in which a primary agent decomposes user requests and delegates subtasks to three specialized subagents: one for data retrieval, one for analysis, and one for report generation. In production, the team observes that subagents are making redundant tool calls, occasionally exceeding token budgets, and sometimes producing outputs that contradict each other – all of which the primary agent passes along without catching. What is the most appropriate way to address these failures?

  1. A. Strengthen the primary agent’s management layer to enforce per-subagent tool budgets, validate outputs against a defined schema before passing them forward, and establish explicit handoff contracts between stages.
  2. B. Give each subagent read access to the other subagents’ outputs so they can identify and resolve contradictions without routing back through the primary agent.
  3. C. Add retry logic to each subagent so that when a tool call fails, the subagent retries automatically before escalating – and configure each subagent to log its tool calls and outputs to a shared trace so the team can audit redundancy and contradictions after the fact.
  4. D. Collapse the three subagents into a single large-context model call that handles retrieval, analysis, and generation in one pass.
正解と解説を表示

正解

A

解説

Strengthen the primary agent's management layer with per-subagent tool budgets, output schema validation before handoff, and explicit handoff contracts between stages. Source: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/agents-and-tools/agent-patterns

問題 18

Question#18Topic1

A teammate has asked you to explain when a Skill would be the right choice over an MCP server. The teammate is unsure how the two differ in practice when both can be reused across teams. How would you explain the distinction?

  1. A. A Skill is preferable for cross-team reuse because it loads more efficiently than an MCP server during normal operation in the team’s typical multi-team workloads.
  2. B. A Skill bundles prompts, scripts, and data into a package the model loads as a unit while a MCP server exposes resources, tools, and prompts through a standard client interface.
  3. C. A Skill and an MCP server are equivalent extension mechanisms that the team can use interchangeably for any reusable capability that needs to be accessible across teams.
  4. D. A Skill is the older mechanism and an MCP server is the newer one, so the team should prefer an MCP server for any reusable capability that the team builds going forward.
正解と解説を表示

正解

B

解説

A Skill bundles prompts, scripts, and data into a package the model loads as a unit, while an MCP server exposes resources, tools, and prompts through a standard client interface. Source: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills

問題 19

Question#19Topic1

You are designing a Claude application that will process customer support tickets in two stages: a triage stage that classifies tickets and a response stage that drafts replies. The team is debating whether to use a single Claude call that handles both stages or separate Claude calls for each stage. How would you structure the application?

  1. A. Use separate Claude calls for triage and response, because each stage has distinct inputs, outputs, and success criteria that benefit from focused prompts.
  2. B. Use a single Claude call for triage and then use a non-Claude rule-based system for response generation, on the grounds that rule-based systems are more reliable for drafting replies.
  3. C. Use multiple Claude calls in parallel that each draft a complete ticket reply, then have a fourth Claude call select the best one to send to the customer.
  4. D. Use a single Claude call for both stages, on the grounds that a single call is cheaper than multiple calls in any production Claude application setup.
正解と解説を表示

正解

A

解説

Use separate Claude calls for triage and response because each stage has distinct inputs, outputs, and success criteria that benefit from focused prompts. Source: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/chain-prompts

問題 20

Question#20Topic1

Your Claude application uses structured output that is consumed by downstream code. The team wants to handle malformed or unexpected output gracefully so it does not crash downstream systems. The best choice for handling this issue would be to ...

  1. A. use the output the model produces and leave schema enforcement to a later phase of production after the application is more complete.
  2. B. apply defensive parsing to handle unexpected fields, missing values, and type mismatches that the downstream code might otherwise crash on.
  3. C. crash on any unexpected output and require manual recovery on affected requests the application handles during normal operation.
  4. D. silently drop any output that does not match expectations so downstream systems do not see the malformed output the application receives from the model.
正解と解説を表示

正解

B

解説

Apply defensive parsing to handle unexpected fields, missing values, and type mismatches so downstream systems do not crash on malformed structured output. Source: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/build-with-claude/structured-outputs

ダウンロードと個人利用

  • この試験の練習問題を、1・3・6・12か月のダウンロード期間で個別に購入できます。
  • お支払い確認後、作成状況がマイライブラリに表示されます。PDF の準備完了時にメールでお知らせします。
  • 期間内は再ダウンロードできます。期限後は新しい期間をご購入ください。
  • PDF は個人学習専用です。転売や公開共有は禁止されています。
  • 期限後も端末に保存済みのファイルを遠隔で削除することはありません。
資格試験の選び方