問題 11
Question#11Topic1
A corporation is searching for the most cost-effective recovery site that they can find. They can tolerate a small amount of outage time. What would you suggest?
正解と解説を表示
正解
A
解説
Correct answer: Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) DRaaS would be one of the most cost-effective options. The company does not need to lease another site. They do not need to supply hardware and software at that site. They only pay for the service that they are using. Most of the time, it would be a very small bill to have the virtual servers, router, and switches built, but not active. Only once there is a disaster and they are processing data would there be a bill of any sizable amount. A cold site and hot site both require leasing or purchasing an actual building, and that alone is not that cheap. A hot site also already has all of the hardware and software there, set up and maintained, waiting for the day of the disaster-level failure. A cold site will take a long time to become operational, which does not match the needs of the company. A mobile site can be transported fairly quickly to the needed location, but that really depends on the actual distance it must travel. It can be equipped with hardware and such activity, but it will take longer to bring that active compared to a DRaaS solution.CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition. Pg 284–285.